Difference between revisions of "User talk:Bytor"
(→spam: new section) |
(→re: captcha: new section) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
[[Technologies_have_fully_evolved_the_...]] (thanks)--[[User:Cyber-the-password-forgetter|volatile memory]] 06:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | [[Technologies_have_fully_evolved_the_...]] (thanks)--[[User:Cyber-the-password-forgetter|volatile memory]] 06:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == re: captcha == | ||
+ | |||
+ | attempted to create a new page and had to do infinite captchas. intentional? --[[User:Cyber-the-password-forgetter|volatile memory]] 03:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:57, 26 March 2014
Ugh, had to deal with vandalism this early on. User talk:Shoes521. Can you get rid of it? Amysteriousgal 20:28, 17 October 2011 (CDT) Taken care of. I wonder how it managed to find this place? Bytor 18:12, 19 October 2011 (CDT)
Vandalism
Could you consider adding editing captchas? I hate captchas, but I'd rather have captchas than spam. Ahania 06:41, 18 December 2011 (CST)
I'll look into it sometime this week. Someday, I'd like to get e-mail shit straightened out on my server so that I can require verification to register as well. I occasionally check for people blanking stuff in the logs, and delete the pages/accounts that were involved. (bytor, too lazy to log in)
- I have zero experience with wiki administration, but perhaps it's possible to create an user group for "confirmed human users" (basically anyone who's been making sensible edits) to bypass the CAPTCHA check. I understand if it's too much of a pain to implement, though. --アラベスク 17:03, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
spam
Technologies_have_fully_evolved_the_... (thanks)--volatile memory 06:34, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
re: captcha
attempted to create a new page and had to do infinite captchas. intentional? --volatile memory 03:57, 26 March 2014 (UTC)